// Performance Dashboard · as of March 25, 2026

We measure what
actually matters.

Start Your Search →

Unlike most recruiting firms, we don't measure time to fill. Time to fill includes how long your calendar takes to clear, how many interview rounds you want to run, and whether a finalist declines at the offer stage. It's a terrible recruiter metric — and tracking it is a convenient way for recruiters to hide behind their client's process.

We measure Time to Identify (TTI) — the number of days from search kickoff to the moment we surface the person who gets hired.

We own this number. It reflects our sourcing depth, our judgment, and our network.

0 days average TTI
0 days median TTI
Across Director, VP, and C-suite level searches in engineering, product, operations, and go-to-market.

TTI Distribution across our most recent 30 completed searches

Under 2 weeks55%
2–4 weeks21%
1–2 months18%
Over 2 months6%

Like an investor evaluating trailing returns — not since-inception performance — we measure across our most recent 30 completed searches. It's a rolling window that reflects how we're operating right now, not how we performed two years ago. Teams evolve, markets shift, and we believe you deserve to see our current form.

Time to Identify
0 days
average
0 days
median
Across Director, VP, and C-suite level searches
Resonance placement records · trailing 30 searches
Search Success Rate
0%
2× the industry average · 30 placed hires out of 42 search engagements in the same period
Resonance search records
Active Searches Now
0
Operations (12) · Engineering (7) · GTM (4) · Product (3) · Marketing (2)
As of March 25, 2026
// How we compare
Contingency Firms
Volume model · no exclusivity
Time to identify
Not tracked
Firms optimize for volume of submittals, not sourcing precision
Fill rate
20–35%
Most searches go nowhere — spread thin across many clients
Reqs per recruiter
20–40
Factory model; hard to go deep on any single search
Client investment
Low upfront
No fee unless placement — but low success rate often means wasted months
Resonance
Boutique · high-touch · contingency & contained
Time to identify
19 days avg
9-day median · our most important number
Fill rate
71%
Near-retained outcomes (80–90%) at contingency terms — no retainer required
Reqs per recruiter
~7
Focused, not spread thin — we go deep on every search
Client investment
Flexible
Contingency or contained, tailored per search — no retainer required
Retained Exec Search
Exclusive · upfront fee · slow
Time to identify
45–60 days
Industry-standard sourcing timeline for senior searches
Fill rate
80–90%
High — but they only take guaranteed, exclusive mandates
Reqs per recruiter
5–10
Focused — but slow and expensive to engage
Client investment
Upfront retainer
33–40% of fee paid before a single candidate is presented
Contingency fill rate: industry estimates range 20–35% (Staffing Industry Analysts, general market data). Retained exec search benchmarks: 80–90% fill rate, 90–120 day typical timeline (industry-standard engagement terms). Resonance operates primarily on contingency with a 71% fill rate — 2× the industry average for contingency and approaching retained-level outcomes. Resonance data: internal placement records, trailing 30 placed searches and all engagements within the same period (42 total).
// Current Capacity
Active search load — 4 recruiters
0 10 20 30 35 max
28
/ 35 searches
80% capacity
Active searches per recruiter (avg)
7
Open searches available
7
// Active Searches
Function Title Level Location Status
EngineeringSr. Mechatronics Engineer — ApplicationsSeniorNew York, NYIn progress
EngineeringSr. Mechatronics Engineer — Robot PlatformSeniorNew York, NYIn progress
EngineeringFounding Software EngineerFoundingNew York, NYIn progress
EngineeringFounding AI EngineerFoundingNew York, NYIn progress
EngineeringCo-Founder / Founding EngineerFoundingBrooklyn, NYIn progress
EngineeringSr. Robotic Software EngineerSeniorLos Altos, CAIn progress
EngineeringSr. Machine Learning EngineerSeniorLos Altos, CAIn progress
ProductHead of ProductVPRemoteOffer
ProductProduct DesignerICNew York, NYIn progress
ProductProduct DesignerICRemoteIn progress
OperationsVP, Investor Relations & Strategic OperationsVPNew York, NYIn progress
OperationsExecutive Consultant AdvisorySeniorRemoteIn progress
OperationsStrategic Projects LeadSeniorNew York, NYIn progress
OperationsChief of StaffSeniorSan Francisco, CAOffer
OperationsChief of StaffSeniorSan Francisco, CAIn progress
OperationsChief of Staff & Portfolio Ops LeadSeniorNYC or SFIn progress
OperationsChief of StaffSeniorNew York, NYIn progress
OperationsChief of StaffSeniorLos Angeles, CAIn progress
OperationsChief of StaffSeniorSan Francisco, CAIn progress
OperationsChief of StaffSeniorNew York, NYJust opened
OperationsChief of StaffSeniorAustin, TXJust opened
OperationsChief of StaffSeniorSan Francisco, CAJust opened
GTMGrowth MarketerSeniorRemoteIn progress
GTMNarrative LeadSeniorRemoteIn progress
GTMSales LeadSeniorLos Angeles, CAIn progress
GTMSales LeadSeniorRemoteIn progress
MarketingVP of MarketingVPRemoteIn progress
MarketingBrand MarketerSeniorLos Angeles, CAIn progress
Methodology: "Time to identify" = days from search kickoff to the moment we surface the person who ultimately gets hired. It does not include client interview scheduling, offer negotiation, or start date. "Success rate" = searches resulting in a placed hire divided by all closed searches (excludes on-hold and queued roles). Company names and role titles withheld to protect client confidentiality. Competitive benchmarks: Contingency fill rate estimates from Staffing Industry Analysts general market data. Retained exec search benchmarks from publicly quoted industry timelines (90–120 day typical engagement) and fill rate ranges (80–90%).

We take on a limited number of searches each month.

If you're hiring for a critical role at a VC-backed startup, let's talk.

Start Your Search With Us →